The High Cost of Noncompliance
OSHA inspection violations can
be costly, but seven hot spots cause most of
the fines.
April 2002 -
OSHA announces fines of $87,750 against a major
precast manufacturer located in the southern
United States.
June 2002 -
OSHA levies fines of $44,100 against a southeastern
U.S.-based company for alleged safety and health
violations.
These are just two instances
in which an OSHA inspection resulted in fines
for the targeted company. In 2001, OSHA performed
more than 1,300 inspections at concrete producing/manufacturing
facilities in the United States. In December
alone, there were 39 inspections - more than
one a day - with 26 (67 percent) of these resulting
in fines. That equates to 132 violations totaling
almost $125,000 in proposed penalties for the
targeted firms.
In this age of narrowing profit
margins and increased emphasis on the bottom
line, it's understandable that safety and health
concerns sometimes get lost in the shuffle.
Turnover in the workforce is another contributing
factor; it's tough to maintain a safety-conscious
employee base when your average employee's term
with the company is less than a year. Still,
as the figures show, no company can afford to
ignore safety and compliance issues. Such behavior
will inevitably end up costing the firm money
as a result of accidents, OSHA enforcement,
increased insurance premiums, etc.
This being the case, what
should your company do to create a hazard-free
workplace? Obviously, there is no universal
answer to this question, no solution that will
fit every precast concrete company reading these
words. But valuable insight can be gained by
looking at OSHA's enforcement history where
precast concrete companies (SIC 3272) are concerned
and concentrating on those areas which are common
sources of violations. Let's look at some data
taken from the Bureau of Labor Statistics from
October 2000 through September 2001 (the most
recent data available). Note that the "rankings"
are determined by the dollar amounts of penalties
assessed, rather than the number of citations
issued.
For instance, nearly one-sixth
of the total "penalty dollars" assessed
were for violations of the OSHA's Code of Federal
Regulations §1910.147 (Control of Hazardous
Energy). This regulation, better known as Lockout/Tagout,
concerns the prevention of accidental powering-up
or energizing of equipment being serviced or
repaired, or that has been designated unsafe
to operate. The name comes from the locks or
tags used to prevent access to the energy source
of the machine undergoing maintenance. OSHA
takes this area very seriously, as the consequences
of noncompliance can easily be fatal.
To comply with this standard,
companies must have a written Lockout-Tagout
program, must have the appropriate tools (i.e.,
locks and/or tags), and must train all employees
to one of three levels dictated by the standard.
All training must be documented with signatures
of the employees trained, the trainer, notes
about the level of instruction provided and
the date of the training. Such documentation
should be kept in two places: in the employee's
personnel file and in the company's general
training and orientation logs.
Given our industry's reliance
on overhead/gantry cranes and similar machinery,
it should come as no surprise that OSHA's crane
and gantry standard (CFR §1910.179) gets
quite a bit of attention as well. What is surprising
is the number of violations of this regulation
OSHA inspectors have assessed. With 34 citations
totaling nearly $43,000, this is the second-most
penalized standard. In fact, steel mills (SIC
3312) represented the only industry penalized
more than precast concrete manufacturers.
While it can be argued that
this standard is overly nitpicky (and that argument
has some merit), two facts remain: The stipulations
were put in place based on the American National
Standards Institute (ANSI) procedures, so there
is some basis supporting them; and, like it
or not, you're expected to comply with it.
Your first action should be
to get a copy of the regulation and verify every
measurement and operating parameter of your
equipment to ensure it checks out. Implement
a maintenance schedule and log all significant
inspections, noting the date, inspector, what
was checked and findings. "Significant
inspections" means your routine maintenance
checks, as opposed to the pre-operations checks
that must be performed prior to each shift or
period the machinery is in use. Note that the
standard mandates different minimum inspection
periods for various portions or aspects of the
equipment. Refer to section (j) of the standard
for a complete breakdown of inspection intervals.
Finally, the standard requires
that only "authorized employees" be
allowed to operate the equipment. While no guidelines
are given for what constitutes an authorized
employee, it's suggested that you have a skilled
operator train the employees who will be using
or working around your overhead/gantry crane(s)
- and, as always, document that training.
Although it may appear that
at least one regulation exists to cover each
aspect of occupational activity, there are actually
still quite a few "holes" in the OSHA
blanket. That's where CFR §5(a)(1), the
so-called General Duty Clause, comes in. This
is OSHA's wild card. It states, in part, that
employers are required to provide "a place
of employment … free from recognized hazards
that are causing or are likely to cause death
or serious physical harm." This rule (No.
3 on the precast violations list) is cited by
inspectors anytime they deem a health hazard
exists but for which there is no corresponding
OSHA standard. Thus it is nearly impossible
to provide advice on how to comply with the
General Duty Clause other than to emphasize
best safety practices from upper management
on down.
No. 4 on the hot list is one
of those things where we all know better, but
do it anyway. The standard is CFR §1910.23
(Guarding Floor & Wall Openings & Holes).
This regulation governs a variety of features:
stairwells and ladders (and their openings/landing
points); hatchways, trapdoors and manholes;
open-sided walkways; windows; and toeboards
- just to mention a few. Similar to CFR §1910.179
(Overhead and Gantry Cranes), the best way to
avoid a fine in this area is to grab a copy
of the standard and evaluate your facility inch
by inch according to the regulation. Unfortunately,
this is an area that is something of a "sleeping
giant" - you can go for years without giving
it a second thought, but when an accident occurs,
hefty penalties can be assessed for "deliberate
indifference."
The fifth-most cited OSHA
standard is CFR §1910.95 (Occupational
Noise Exposure). Generally speaking, if your
operation produces noise at or above the "action
level" defined by the standard, you must
implement a hearing conservation program complete
with a written program, training for all affected
employees and appropriate protective gear. Determining
whether or not your operation meets the "action
level" can be difficult. The best solution
is to arrange for testing from an industrial
hygienist. Note that many state OSHA programs
or departments of labor provide such services
at little or no cost. And if it turns out you
must implement a hearing conservation program,
consider employing a third-party firm to handle
the chore for you. Such organizations have physicians
on staff to provide the audiograms required,
provide mobile testing vans, etc., all of which
can save you a great many headaches.
Violation category No. 6 is
another familiar face: Machines - General Requirements
(CFR §1910.212). Just because this standard
isn't at the top of the list don't let it lull
you into a false sense of security. Enforcement
of this standard is the No. 1 priority for OSHA
inspectors nationwide. Your responsibilities
in complying with the rule are relatively simple.
One, ensure that all your machines (mixers,
presses, sifters, belts, etc.) are properly
guarded and that these guards are used without
fail - 100 percent of the time. Remember that
OSHA's position is that all machines can be
guarded. In addition, make certain that personnel
are trained to use the equipment they are assigned
to and that your machines receive periodic service
inspections (which, of course, you should document).
The seventh and final area
is CFR §1910.146 (Permit-Required Confined
Spaces). It is very rare that a month goes by
without at least a fatality or two related to
this standard. The standard includes a flow
chart (Appendix A to the standard) to be used
to determine if your facility has an area that
qualifies as a "permit-required confined
space" (PRCS). Most precast manufacturers
do indeed have one or more. Do your organization
and your workers a favor: Evaluate your workplace
with a critical eye and, if necessary, implement
a PRCS program. This will entail crafting a
written program, training your employees and
establishing a permit system (similar to the
locks and tags in the Lockout-Tagout standard)
to administer access to dangerous areas.
While these seven standards
are only a small fraction of all OSHA regulations,
they represent nearly 60 percent of the total
dollar amount of fines assessed against precast
concrete manufacturers. While the potential
for heavy fines should
be a serious consideration for your business,
it’s important to keep in mind the more
important reason: the continued safety and welfare
of your employees. Compliance with these standards
costs relatively little – especially when
compared to the consequences of death or serious
injury to one of your workers.
Keep it safe.
Back
to Winter 2003 Table of Contents