Search the Site:


 
Precast Solutions Magazine

Related article

Precast Solutions Summer 2003

Concrete Coatings

There’s more to protect than just concrete.


Dean Frank is Director of Technical Services at NPCA.

When specifying coatings for use on precast concrete products, engineers and other specifiers aim to protect the concrete. However, many do not consider the protection of the environment or manufacturing personnel when deciding which coating to use. Many traditional coatings are harmful to the environment and toxic to humans. Therefore, when considering more than just performance, specifiers can protect the environment as well as the health and safety of manufacturing personnel by making an informed decision regarding the various concrete coatings they specify.

Common coating uses
Precast concrete products that most often receive the added protection of coatings include manholes, tanks, vaults and other below-grade products. Coatings are usually separated into two types: exterior and interior.

Exterior coatings are often applied at the manufacturer’s plant prior to being shipped to a jobsite for installation. They may also be applied at the jobsite. Exterior coatings are generally used for one or more of the following reasons:

  • Dampproofing – treatment of the concrete surface to retard the absorption of water or penetration of water vapor.
  • Waterproofing – treatment of the concrete surface to prevent the absorption of water or penetration of water vapor.
  • Protection from chemical attack – treatment of the concrete surface to reduce the likelihood of damage or deterioration from a corrosive environment or other aggressive substances in soils, such as sulfates.
Interior coatings are used primarily for protection of the concrete from attack by aggressive substances that can be found in sewer systems, such as hydrogen sulfide gas or microbial-induced corrosion (MIC). (see sidebar “Manhole Menace” for more information on MIC).

Types of coatings available
In the past, coal tar and/or petroleum-based materials were the most common exterior coating used for dampproofing and waterproofing. These types of coatings are often hazardous to the health of those applying them. Cleanup and disposal of these coatings also require special precautions to protect the environment.

Today, there are better alternatives. Water-based coatings are preferred over coal tar or other petroleum-based materials. Water-based coatings do not pose health hazards to personnel applying them and they are environmentally friendly, thus reducing and/or eliminating the necessity for special precautions for cleanup and disposal. They also penetrate the concrete surface well because capillary action draws the coating into the pores of the concrete, creating an effective barrier.

There are a myriad of other materials that can be used as coating materials as well. These include epoxies, epoxy mortars, polyesters, polyester mortars, urethanes, vinyl esters, vinyl ester mortars, silicone, polyurea, phenolic and specialty concrete coatings. When considering a coating, you should contact the manufacturer directly and request a list of applications along with reference projects.

Most likely coal tar-based coatings are still prevalent because specifications that call for their use have not been updated to reflect the availability of more user- and earth-friendly coatings.

Alternatives to interior coatings
Many people believe that interior coatings cannot possibly fully protect the concrete because small bubbles and pinholes can form in the coating material during or after application. These small holes offer access to the concrete, effectively reducing the protection that would otherwise be available. According to a study performed by County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, the one variable that most affects the performance of a coating is the quality of the application. The predominant reason for coating failure cited in the study was the formation of pinholes.

Additionally, many are opposed to using hazardous coatings because of the safety and environmental hazards associated with them. Many precast concrete manufacturers refuse to work with hazardous coatings at their plants altogether and subcontract the work out to specialty companies.

One alternative is to use a liner cast into the surface of the concrete. These liners are composed of a material that can resist the attack from the environment within the sewer while utilizing the strength and durability of precast concrete. Liners have proven to be a very effective solution.

Another option is to use an antimicrobial concrete additive that prevents the harmful bacterial colonies from forming on the concrete surface. These additives treat the entire thickness of the concrete, they cannot be damaged or worn off, and have been quite effective in protecting concrete from the detrimental effects of MIC. However, it should be noted that such an additive only prevents bacteria from collecting on the concrete surface, not the other materials that might be found inside a sewer such as manhole steps. It may be possible for the bacteria to collect on non-concrete surfaces and still produce sulfuric acid that can damage the uncoated or unlined concrete, especially if the concrete is in contact with the non-concrete material. Nonetheless, this technology shows great promise in the fight against microbial-induced concrete corrosion.

A matter of ethics
The best approach for specifiers is to determine which potentially damaging substances are likely to be encountered once the precast concrete product has been installed and is in service. Once this is established, determine the appropriate method of protection while taking into consideration the precautions associated with that particular material’s use.

Engineers are ethically and professionally responsible for the safe use and function of structures and systems they design, but do they have any obligation to those who construct what they have designed? This issue is often debated and engineers are increasingly being held accountable for jobsite safety and the welfare of those who actually bring their designs into reality. Regardless of whether engineers are legally accountable, ensuring that the materials specified are safe not only for the end users but also for environment and production personnel is the right thing to do. Thus, informed engineers and other specifiers can take advantage of the beneficial properties of user- and earth-friendly liners and coatings in addition to the inherent quality, value and permanence of precast concrete.

For more information on concrete coatings, please use the search engine at www.precast.org to locate a manufacturer.

 
 
The Precast Show