|
 |
 |
Precast Solutions Magazine |
 |
|
|
|
Why Precast Costs Less
The total cost of ownership equals
quality, service, delivery and price.
Would you pay a higher price
if it bought a lower cost? For contractors and
specifiers, there is a big difference between
price and cost. While price is but one element
of cost, it is the initial, most visible and
the easier of the two to understand. Focusing
on price is not a preferred strategy in any
business, especially where high-quality, reliable
manufactured goods are concerned. Instead, for
precast concrete products, the focus should
be on the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO).
How is TCO calculated? The
Total Cost of Ownership is equal to the sum
of the four cost components: quality, service,
delivery and price.
In terms of cost elements,
a distinct advantage of precast concrete over
cast-in-place (CIP) is speed of delivery and
ease of installation, or service. Both contribute
directly to lower Total Cost of Ownership. Precast
concrete, especially when produced in certified
plants, boasts the additional benefit of higher
quality. Controlled batch proportions placed
under uniform conditions consistently creates
a better product than can be cast in place.
For illustration purposes, we will use an ordinary
precast underground structure.
On the construction site,
scheduling is an important, unpredictable and
expensive risk. Nature stacks the cost odds
against CIP concrete. It is a much quicker and
less risky choice to have the precast delivered
and installed the same day rather than excavate,
form, pour and strip the CIP concrete, cure,
damp proof and backfill. Given the cost matrix
in Example 1, it could save six days in construction
scheduling.
|
Example
1 - Cost Comparison of Precast to Cast
in Place Concrete
|
| Operation |
Precast |
CIP |
|
Number
of Days |
Number
of Days |
| Excavate, Backfill, Connect,
etc. |
Same |
Same |
| Pour, Cure, Strip Base |
1 |
2 |
| Pour, Cure, Strip Walls |
|
2 |
| Pour, Cure, Strip Top |
|
2 |
| Damp proof all Exterior Surfaces |
|
1 |
| Install on site |
Additional |
Included |
| Total Duration in Days |
1 |
7 |
| Price (Furnish
and Install) |
$2,000.00 |
$1,400.00 |
| Total Cost of Ownership
(TCO) |
$2,400.00 |
$1,400.00 + ??? |
For illustration purposes,
consider a typical below-grade structure. For
the inside dimensions of a 4-by-8-by-4-foot
structure of either precast (6 inches thick)
or CIP (8 inches thick), assume these facts:
-
CIP requires
three separate days to pour the base, walls
and top. Curing and stripping adds one day
to each step, requiring six days to cast on
site.
-
Damp proofing
adds one day to the CIP process, totaling
seven working days of open-hole time.
-
Allowing
an average $350 per cubic yard for small jobs
(ready mix, rebar, mastic, labor and equipment),
the 4 cubic yards of CIP required prices out
at $1,400.
-
Precast takes
only one day to deliver and install, including
backfill of the pre-damp proofed unit.
-
The precast
alternative to produce and truck to the job
site prices out at $2,000.
-
Installing
the precast requires a four-hour minimum charge
of $400 for a 20-ton crane.
-
Hardware
costs for fittings, embedded items, etc.,
are identical for precast and CIP.
The TCO of precast is fixed
at $2,400. However, the TCO of CIP is just beginning
at $1,400. That raises the question among doubters
as to why a contractor would spend more for
precast. But many savvy contractors and specifiers
recognize that their costs are actually less
with precast.
The six days of additional
scheduling are required by the mechanics of
pouring and curing concrete on site. The work
could be done off site in a quality controlled
precast plant while other work on site progresses.
Even if a contractor has a concrete crew doing
multiple projects on site, the efficiency gained
by substituting as much precast as possible
cannot be ignored.
A contractor saves money for
every minute he or she is ahead of schedule.
If a $1 million contract yields a 10 percent
profit margin and can be completed in 10 months,
that equates to $10,000 per month, or $333 per
day in profit. Saving six days means an additional
profit of 6 x $333 or $2,000. Furthermore, that
savings is compounded by the elimination of
general conditions costs of about $500 per day
for the burden of supervision, insurance, fixed
and variable job site costs, etc.
And these are just actual
costs. Add to this the avoidance of liquidated
damages, and the cost advantage of precast concrete
becomes the overwhelming choice. The cost advantages
are summarized in Example 2.
| Example
2 - TCO of Precast vs. Cast-in-Place Concrete |
|
Cost
Element |
Precast |
CIP |
| Price |
$2,400.00 |
$1,400.00 |
Cost of Additional Time (Delivery)
6 days at $333 Discounted
50% for conservatism Cost Savings
Additional Time |
$0
-$0
$0
|
$2,000.00
-$1,000.00
$1,000.00
|
Cost of General Conditions
(Service)
6 days at $500 Discounted
50% for conservatism Cost Savings
Additional Time |
$0
-$0
$0
|
$3,000.00
-$1,500.00
$1,500.00
|
| Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) |
$2,400.00 |
$3,900.00 |
The price of precast concrete
may have been 75 percent higher than CIP, but
its Total Cost of Ownership was actually about
45 percent lower, making it the clear low-cost
choice.
This cost comparison offers
a best-case scenario for CIP. Some of its built-in
problems include the coordination of trades
required to pour concrete on site, especially
in union-intensive areas. Four separate trades
could be involved, thereby adding cost, confusion
and unnecessary risk of downtime to accommodate
carpenters to form and strip, rod busters to
place rebar, laborers to pour concrete and finishers
to damp proof. Other problems associated with
CIP concrete are poor quality control associated
with additional water, untimely deliveries and
placement problems, all of which are eliminated
by the precast option. Add to all this the problems
associated with keeping a hole open - such as
water infiltration, accidents, frozen ground
and temporary heat in cold weather - and the
choice of precast looks even better.
A proven strategy for
increased sales, growth in market share and
greater profitability is to capitalize on the
low-cost advantages. Precast is the better mousetrap
at a lower cost. Make the TCO strategy a part
of every contract. You are seeking the best
value, and by definition the best value is the
lowest Total Cost of Ownership.
Robert Menard is a construction
industry expert and a professional speaker. Reach
him at 214-513-8484 or visit his Web site at www.RobertMenard.com.
Back
to Spring 2004 Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
 |