Reinventing the dome
Nearly a century in the making, the
Oklahoma City Capitol finally gets its dome.
By
Bridget McCrea
Trying to piece together a dome
on top of a building is a lot like putting pieces
of pie back into a pan: The task starts out relatively
easy, but becomes progressively harder as the structure
takes shape. "It's not the first piece that bothers
you – it's the last one," says John Jamison,
project executive at Oklahoma City-based Manhattan
Construction Co.
And Jamison should know. His firm, along with Tulsa,
Okla.-based Flintco, came together in a joint venture
known as "Capitol Dome Builders" to construct
a dome for the Oklahoma State Capitol building. A
monumental undertaking, the project required more
than 1,200 precast concrete pieces that altogether
weighed more than 1,300 tons: The heaviest pieces
weighed almost 8 tons. These pieces contributed to
what is now an 80 foot-diameter-dome, which projects
157 feet above the existing roof and weighs more than
2,500 tons.
Hoisting the panels 280 feet in the air, then situating
them one-eighth of an inch away from one another around
the entire circumference of the dome was no easy task,
says Jamison, particularly when it came down to the
last few pieces. "We didn't have a saw or jack
hammer to get them in place," he recounts, "so
it had to be perfect all the way around, or we knew
we'd have a problem in the end."
Thanks to the controlled environment of manufacturing
and curing the panels at a precast plant – Arkansas
Precast and Structural Stone LLC, of Jacksonville,
Ark. – Jamison says those final moments of completion
went without a hitch. Additionally, he says precast
ensured flexibility when shaping the dome, durability,
speed of construction and precise color matching with
the existing structure.
"We put a lot of effort into matching the color
of the building – but what color do you put
on a building that's 87 years old?" Jamison asks.
"By combining technology with the precast –
with its adaptability of colors – we were able
to find the right match."
Dusting It
Off
For much of the 20th century Oklahoma's state capitol
operated in an "unfinished" state due to
a lack of funding and steel spurred by World War I.
Though the capitol itself was completed, the limestone
dome with its cast-in-place concrete structure as
envisioned by the original architects in 1914 never
came to fruition.
That was, until the state dusted off those original
plans and decided that the structure should be completed
by the state's centennial in 2007. Six years ago,
Frankfurt-Short-Bruza Architects P.C. of Oklahoma
City completed a feasibility study for the project
and determined that the existing structure could indeed
support a dome. At that point, the Oklahoma state
legislature approved an act that would allow the project
to proceed using a design-build process.
Before construction could begin, the dome would be
redesigned to include the latest building materials.
"We changed a lot of systems," says Jamison.
Concrete frame and ashlar stone, for example, was
changed to precast concrete. The switch helped lighten
the structure considerably, says Jamison, and allowed
the builders to match the new dome's colors to the
existing limestone-covered building.
Construction began in April 2001 and finished in November
2002, just in time for Oklahoma's Statehood Day. During
that 18-month stint, the capitol remained open and
two different legislative sessions proceeded in a
"business as usual" fashion. "The building
never shut down," says Jamison.
When the original saucer dome was removed, it left
behind a 80-foot-diameter hole in the top of the building,
which was sealed by closing off an area of the capitol,
then soundproofing it. Additionally, various historic
murals and a stained-glass skylight had to be protected
from damage during construction.
"Due to these and other factors, we had to build
everything up and out," says Jamison. "This
project was about creating a logistical solution:
how to get the panels to the top, how to keep the
building in operation and make sure that the open
hole in the roof remained watertight and secure."
Precast,
Please
Before any precast panels could be installed on the
dome, the construction team had to erect a 280-foot-tall
freestanding tower crane with a 230-foot boom length.
With it, they were able to raise the panels, each
of which weighed more than 15,500 pounds, and then
position them around the dome. The precast portion
of the project took about a month, says Tim Dolf,
senior structural engineer at Frankfurt-Short-Bruza
Architects.
Dolf says precast made the most sense by today's standards
compared to limestone, which he calls "the only
other alternative." It was historically necessary
to make the dome look like the original limestone
material, says Dolf, and that made precast the most
practical alternative. "The decision to use precast
was made almost instantaneously," he adds. "We
had complete confidence that we could make it work."
In addition to the panels, Arkansas Precast delivered
approximately 800 precast pieces, including ornate
items, to the job site. Using the materials helped
cut down on overall construction time and guaranteed
durability and a finished building that looked to
be constructed of the same material, despite the fact
that its major components were built nearly a century
ago.
Jamison says the design-build team added components
like silicone sealant, epoxy-coated rebar and stainless
steel connections to the precast structures in order
to create a "100-year structure" and guarantee
adequate waterproofing.
"We didn't want to worry about rusty connections
or the penetration of water through the panels,"
says Jamison. "It was all handled very easily
at the precast plant, and when they arrived on the
job site all of the molds, shapes and sizes fit perfectly
with what we were looking to do."
Although construction of the dome progressed as planned
and finished ahead of schedule, Jamison says the project
was delayed somewhat by Mother Nature. Wind was the
biggest issue, he says, since erecting heavy precast
panels 280 feet in the air is not an option when the
wind reaches 50 mph. He estimates that the job was
shut down for about 45 days due to such forces.
"At times, we had crews out there working at
2 a.m. because the wind had subsided," says Jamison,
who calls the overall project a tremendous success
based on the fact that it was finished under budget,
ahead of schedule and beyond expectations. The latter
is particularly important since the project had more
than its fair share of opposition.
"A lot of Oklahomans thought it would be ridiculous
to add a dome to the capitol now, 90 years after the
building was constructed," explains Blake Wade,
executive director of the Oklahoma Capitol Complex
and Centennial Commission. "Today, I can honestly
say that it exceeded the expectations of the entire
state, and that it’s now the No. 1 tourist attraction
for our great state."
Wade credits precast concrete with helping to make
the dream a reality and with an affordable, manageable
and enduring product. "It was a thrill to be
able to work with all of these fine companies,"
says Wade, "and know that because of precast,
it was all able to get done," he says.
Jamison
says the camaraderie of the group that designed and
built the dome was above par and resulted in such
a successful project that he'd do over again, if he
could – despite the challenges that could come
from trying to get that "last piece" in
place. "We'd like to build another dome,"
he says, "but that's the last one for Oklahoma."
Project Profile
Project Name:
Oklahoma State Capital Dome
Owner:
State of Oklahoma
Architect: Frankfurt-Short-Bruza
Architects, Oklahoma City, Okla.
Contractor: Manhattan
Construction, Oklahoma City, and Flintco, Tulsa, Okla.
Engineer:
J. Posey Associates, Inc., Baltimore, MD
Precast Manufacturer:
Arkansas Precast and Structural Stone LLC, Jacksonville,
Ark.